Suspected Binance Hack: About $5.6bn in Reported Outflows as Crypto Markets Slide

A suspected Binance hack shook crypto markets late on 29 October 2026. On-chain tallies put outflows from Binance-labelled wallets at about $5.6bn across several blockchains, according to BWEnews and Decrypt. Bitcoin briefly slipped below $79,000 and BNB fell close to 7% over 24 hours, according to Crypto News Flash. This article reflects information available as of 21:50 UTC on 29 October 2026 (21:50 UK time, 17:50 ET).

Binance has not confirmed a hack. In a post on X at 21:15 UTC, edited at 21:29 UTC, it said it was investigating "a potential security issue" and that "user funds are completely safe". The chief executives of Tether and Circle said on X they had frozen more than 1.567bn USDT and 800m USDC linked to the incident. Every figure below may change as the story develops.

The information in this article is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Cryptoassets such as Bitcoin and Ether are highly volatile, and you could lose all the money you invest. Investor protection schemes may not apply to them.

What We Know About the Suspected Binance Hack So Far

The short answer is that large sums moved, and the reason is still officially unexplained. The table below sums up the key points at the cut-off time. Each figure comes from the source named in the caption.

Key Numbers at a Glance

Item Reported figure Status
Outflows from Binance-labelled wallets, all chains About $5.64bn BWEnews tally as of 21:22 UTC, unconfirmed by Binance
Two Ethereum transfers from Binance hot wallets About $3.3bn Tracked by PANews and Odaily
First transfer from the Binance 14 wallet About $2.5bn, incl. ~167,500 ETH and ~1.6bn USDT Visible on Etherscan
Second transfer from Hot Wallet 34 780m USDC Visible on Etherscan
ETH forwarded to a second new address About 195,460 ETH Visible on Etherscan
USDT frozen by Tether More than 1.567bn USDT Stated by Tether's CEO on X
USDC frozen by Circle More than 800m USDC Stated by Circle's CEO on X
Stablecoin freezes stated by the issuers More than $2.3bn Our sum of the two company figures
Crypto liquidations in one hour $629m, of which $607m longs CoinGlass data via PANews
Official hack confirmation from Binance Not issued Binance says it is investigating and that user funds are completely safe

Sources: PANews tracker, Etherscan, Odaily, PANews (CoinGlass data), Tether CEO on X, Circle CEO on X, Binance on X, BWEnews on X. Figures as of 21:50 UTC, 29 October 2026. All figures are provisional. The frozen stablecoins are part of the outflows, so the two totals should not be added together.

The highest tally at the cut-off was about $5.64bn from BWEnews, published at 21:31 UTC. Decrypt reported at least $5.57bn on three main blockchains, citing an on-chain tally, in an article at 21:36 UTC. Earlier estimates were $2.77bn from Walter Bloomberg and "almost $3bn" from SolanaFloor, as cited by Coindoo. These estimates overlap and should not be added together.

Timeline of the Suspected Binance Hot Wallet Hack

The events unfolded quickly during the late US session. That was already the early morning of 30 October in Asia. All times below are UTC, which is also UK time this week.

Time (UTC) Time (ET) Event
20:24 16:24 The Binance 14 hot wallet sends about $2.5bn in one transaction to address 0x5227…CB2f8c
20:24 16:24 About 28,005.6 ETH arrives at the same address from a wallet Etherscan labels Binance 16
20:30 and 20:33 16:30 and 16:33 The receiving address makes two calls to the USDT contract
20:34 16:34 BTC breaks below 80,000 USDT and ETH falls below 2,300 USDT
20:38 16:38 About 195,460 ETH is forwarded to a second new address (0x8532…43D4)
20:41 16:41 780m USDC moves from Binance Hot Wallet 34 to the same receiving address
20:43 16:43 BTC drops below 79,000 USDT
20:58 16:58 PANews reports $629m of liquidations in the past hour
21:14 17:14 Odaily reports, citing on-chain sources, that Tether froze $971m of USDT
21:15 17:15 Binance posts on X that it is investigating reports of a potential security issue
21:15 17:15 CZ posts that user funds are safe and that the event looks like a hack
21:16 17:16 Odaily reports that Circle froze $823m of USDC
21:17 17:17 Yi He posts on X that Binance is investigating a potential security issue
21:18 17:18 Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire says Circle has frozen more than 800m USDC
21:25 17:25 Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino says Tether has frozen more than 1.567bn USDT
21:29 17:29 Odaily reports a further 313m USDT frozen on Tron, lifting its tally to about $2.107bn
21:29 17:29 Binance edits its post to add that user funds are "completely safe"
21:31 17:31 BWEnews publishes a tally of about $5.64bn in outflows from Binance-labelled wallets
21:36 17:36 Decrypt reports at least $5.57bn left Binance-linked wallets
21:44 17:44 Odaily, citing Bitcoin News, reports that the attackers appear to have abused an EIP-7702 delegation

Sources: Etherscan, PANews, PANews (liquidations), Odaily (first report), Odaily (BTC below 79,000), Odaily (Tether), Odaily (Circle), Yi He on X, Binance on X, BWEnews on X, Decrypt, Odaily (EIP-7702), CZ on X, Circle CEO on X, Tether CEO on X, Odaily (Tron freeze). Times converted from UTC+8 and UTC+2 where needed.

What Is Confirmed and What Is Only Reported

Breaking stories mix hard data with early interpretation. Separating the two matters here. The transfers themselves are public on the Ethereum blockchain. The reason for them has not been confirmed by Binance.

What On-Chain Data Shows

Fact Detail Source
First transfer The Binance 14 wallet (0x28C6…1d60) sent ~167,500 ETH, ~1.6bn USDT and 60+ other tokens in one transaction PANews
Second transfer 780m USDC left Binance Hot Wallet 34 for the same address PANews
Etherscan label Etherscan now tags the receiving address "Binance Hot Wallet Exploiter 2" Etherscan
Holdings at ~21:20 UTC Token holdings of about $2.36bn across 64 tokens, plus 1,708.8 ETH Etherscan
Funding trail Etherscan shows the address was first funded by Binance 14 Etherscan

Data checked on Etherscan between 21:10 and 21:20 UTC on 29 October 2026. An Etherscan name tag is a label applied by the block explorer. It is not a statement by Binance.

What Remains Unconfirmed

Claim Who reported it Status at 21:50 UTC
About $5.64bn left Binance-labelled wallets on six networks BWEnews, cited by Odaily; Decrypt gives at least $5.57bn Binance has not confirmed any loss figure
The attackers used an EIP-7702 delegation to move the funds Bitcoin News, cited by Odaily How the authorisation was obtained is unknown
The wallet "appears to have been hacked" BWEnews and Tree News, cited by PANews Interpretation
The initiating address 0x7C86…5CA0 was funded via Tornado Cash PANews, Odaily and researcher Spreek Coindoo could not verify it
$2.77bn left Binance across five blockchains Walter Bloomberg, cited by Coindoo Per-chain breakdown not published
User funds are safe Binance and CZ on X Binance had not published findings
The transfers were an internal reshuffle Raised as a possibility by Coindoo Not ruled out by Binance

Sources: PANews, Coindoo, Binance on X, Odaily (BWEnews tally), Decrypt, Odaily (EIP-7702).

Why the Totals Differ

  • BWEnews covers six networks and arrives at about $5.64bn after removing change outputs and repeated transfers.
  • PANews counts two Ethereum transactions and arrives at about $3.3bn.
  • Walter Bloomberg's $2.77bn covers five blockchains and may already include the USDC transfer.
  • SolanaFloor's "almost $3bn" is a rounded estimate.
  • Coindoo warned that adding these figures together would double-count the same funds.

### Reported Outflows by Blockchain

Blockchain BWEnews (as of 21:22 UTC) Decrypt (21:36 UTC)
Ethereum $3.528bn $3.51bn
Bitcoin $1.449bn $1.44bn (18,270 BTC)
Tron $628m $630m
Arbitrum, Optimism and Base $38m combined Not given
Total About $5.643bn At least $5.57bn

Sources: BWEnews on X, Odaily, Decrypt. Reported tallies, not confirmed by Binance. The frozen stablecoins sit inside these totals.

Binance ran scheduled wallet maintenance on the Ethereum network on 28 October, according to PANews. We did not find a maintenance notice for 29 October. Binance had not said whether the 29 October transfers were linked to any maintenance.

Be On The Edge

Has Binance Confirmed the Hack?

As of 21:50 UTC, Binance had not confirmed a breach. It said user funds were completely safe, without explaining the transfers. Three statements appeared shortly before the cut-off.

Binance's Official Statement

Binance said on its official X account at 21:15 UTC that its teams were "actively investigating" reports of a potential security issue. At 21:29 UTC it edited the post to add that "user funds are completely safe". It said updates would follow through official Binance channels once information was verified. The post did not say whether a hack had taken place or how much had left its wallets.

We did not find a post on the incident from chief executive Richard Teng by 21:50 UTC.

Yi He's Statement

Yi He wrote in a post on X at 21:17 UTC that Binance was "aware of reports of a potential security issue" and was investigating. She said updates would come through official Binance channels. She also warned users to be wary of scams and unofficial links.

What CZ Said

Former chief executive Changpeng Zhao (CZ) wrote in a post on X at 21:15 UTC that user funds were safe. He wrote that "it does look like a hack on Binance". CZ also said he does not manage Binance.com today. He added that, as a shareholder, he expects all user funds to be fully covered. These are his views and are distinct from an official company confirmation.

Binance Withdrawals Status

We did not find an official notice about suspended deposits or withdrawals at the cut-off. The status of Binance withdrawals is therefore unconfirmed in either direction. Users who need certainty usually rely on Binance's own announcements page and status updates.

Tether and Circle Freezes: What Was Reported

Stablecoin issuers can block tokens at specific addresses. That tool matters for the size of any final loss. The figures below come from Odaily's newsflash feed and from posts by the two issuers' chief executives.

Issuer Amount reported frozen Time (UTC) Confirmation
Tether (USDT) About $971m 21:14 Reported by Odaily citing on-chain sources
Circle (USDC) About $823m 21:16 Reported by Odaily
Circle, company figure More than 800m USDC 21:18 Stated by CEO Jeremy Allaire on X
Tether, company figure More than 1.567bn USDT 21:25 Stated by CEO Paolo Ardoino on X
Tether (USDT on Tron) About $313m 21:29 Reported by Odaily
Odaily running total About $2.107bn 21:29 Sum of $971m, $823m and $313m

Sources: Odaily (Tether), Odaily (Circle), Circle CEO on X, Tether CEO on X, Odaily (Tron freeze). Status at 21:35 UTC, 29 October 2026.

The Tether figure matches the 971.1m USDT that Etherscan showed at the receiving address around 21:10 UTC. The Circle figure is slightly larger than the 780m USDC transfer. That gap has not been explained.

Tether's own figure is larger than the sum of Odaily's two USDT items, and Tether did not give a split by blockchain. Part of the USDT freeze is on Tron, and the frozen stablecoins are counted inside the $5.64bn outflow tally. Subtracting the freezes from the outflows would therefore not give a confirmed loss. The ETH forwarded to a second address cannot be frozen by an issuer.

A Tether freeze can limit what an attacker is able to move. Even so, a freeze does not return funds by itself. Any recovery usually needs further legal or technical steps. Readers who want background on the stablecoin itself can see our guide to Tether against the US dollar.

Binance SAFU Fund: Can It Cover the Gap?

Binance holds an emergency reserve called SAFU, short for Secure Asset Fund for Users. In February 2026 it finished converting the fund into 15,000 BTC, reported The Block. Binance pledged to top it back up to $1bn if its value dropped below $800m.

Item Value Note
SAFU holding 15,000 BTC The Block, February 2026
BTC price used $79,143 CoinGecko, 21:46 UTC
SAFU value at that price About $1.19bn Our calculation
Reported outflows, all chains About $5.64bn BWEnews tally
Stablecoin freezes stated by the issuers More than $2.3bn Tether and Circle CEOs, our sum

Sources: The Block, CoinGecko, BWEnews on X, Tether CEO on X, Circle CEO on X. Illustrative arithmetic only. The real loss, if any, is unknown.

On these numbers, the Binance SAFU fund is worth about a fifth of the reported outflows. The stablecoin freezes could reduce any final loss, although the size of that effect is unknown. Binance had not said by the cut-off how any shortfall above SAFU would be covered.

The 2019 Precedent

Binance has been hacked before. In May 2019 attackers stole about 7,000 BTC from a hot wallet, reported Decrypt. Binance said at the time that SAFU would cover the loss in full. The amount was about $40m then, far smaller than the sums tracked today.

Would This Be the Largest Crypto Hack Ever?

If a theft of this size were confirmed, it would exceed the previous record. That record is the roughly $1.5bn Bybit theft of February 2025. The FBI attributed it to North Korea's Lazarus Group, reported BleepingComputer.

Incident Date Reported size Status
Binance hot wallet May 2019 ~7,000 BTC (~$40m then) Confirmed, covered by SAFU
Bybit hack February 2025 ~$1.5bn in ETH Confirmed, FBI attribution
Binance hot wallets (suspected) 29 October 2026 ~$5.6bn in reported outflows Unconfirmed by Binance

Sources: Decrypt, BleepingComputer, BWEnews on X.

The North Korea Question

Two days earlier, Binance said it had blocked several North Korea-linked attack attempts with zero asset losses. We covered that in our BNB price update. Any link between those attempts and today's transfers is speculation. Security firms had not published an attribution by the cut-off.

Market Reaction: Why Is Crypto Falling Today?

Prices fell within minutes of the first reports. Leveraged long positions were forced shut, which added to the selling. The snapshots below come from the times shown.

Bitcoin Price

Time (UTC) BTC level 24h change Source
20:34 79,992.7 USDT -1.48% Odaily (OKX data)
20:43 78,974.5 USDT -2.59% Odaily (OKX data)
~21:04 $78,929.59 -2.64% Crypto News Flash
~21:30 $79,450.40 Not stated Odaily ticker
21:46 $79,143 -2.55% CoinGecko

Sources: Odaily, Crypto News Flash, Odaily ticker, CoinGecko. Snapshots on 29 October 2026. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

The Bitcoin price had already eased below $80,000 in Asian trading on a tech-stock sell-off, according to Crypto News Flash. After the Binance reports, it dipped below $78,500, according to Coindoo. For more background on the week, see our Bitcoin price analysis after the Fed decision.

Ethereum Price

Ether was hit harder than Bitcoin. About 167,500 ETH was among the moved tokens, and about 195,460 ETH has already been forwarded to a second address. Whether that ETH reaches exchanges or swap services remains an open question.

Time (UTC) ETH level 24h change Source
20:34 2,298.65 USDT -2.39% Odaily (OKX data)
~21:04 $2,256.89 -4.14% Crypto News Flash
~21:20 $2,271.12 Not stated Etherscan header
21:46 $2,273.27 -3.69% CoinGecko

Sources: Odaily, Crypto News Flash, Etherscan, CoinGecko. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

BNB Price

BNB is the token most closely tied to Binance itself. It was the weakest of the ten largest coins at about $699.85, down 6.95% over 24 hours, according to Crypto News Flash at around 21:04 UTC. The Odaily ticker showed about $713.43 at around 21:30 UTC. At 21:46 UTC BNB was at $705.35, down 6.73% over 24 hours, according to CoinGecko.

Altcoins and the Hyperliquid Move

Asset Price (~21:04 UTC) 24h change
SOL $96.69 -5.28%
XRP $1.24 -6.40%
BNB $699.85 -6.95%
HYPE $91.86 +13.73%
Total crypto market cap $2.67tn -1.69%

Source: Crypto News Flash, snapshot around 21:04 UTC on 29 October 2026. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

HYPE, the token of the decentralised venue Hyperliquid, was the main gainer. One possible reading is money moving away from centralised exchanges. That reading is an interpretation, and one evening of data is a thin basis for it.

Crypto Liquidations After the Binance News

Forced closures of leveraged positions sped up the fall. Most of them hit traders who had bet on higher prices.

Metric Value Source and time
Liquidations, past hour $629m PANews, 20:58 UTC
Of which longs $607m PANews
Of which shorts $21.7m PANews
BTC liquidations, past hour $190m PANews
ETH liquidations, past hour $157m PANews
Largest single liquidation $11.09m on Binance BTCUSDT PANews
Liquidations, past 24 hours $953m PANews

Source: CoinGlass data as published by PANews. Crypto News Flash showed a slightly different print of $620.41m at a later moment. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Crypto liquidations of this size often deepen short-term moves in both directions. Long-heavy positioning can mean further forced selling if prices drop again. It can also mean sharp rebounds once the forced selling is exhausted.

Liquidation Clusters on the Bitcoin Map

Trigger level Positions at risk Side
BTC below $76,707 About $1.9bn Long positions
BTC above $84,705 About $1.36bn Short positions

Source: CoinGlass data via ChainCatcher, published before the transfers at 18:30 UTC. Levels shift as positions change. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

An unconfirmed event can move prices as much as a confirmed one. Until Binance publishes its findings, every figure in this story is provisional, and markets may react sharply to the next official update.

Trade with £100 on MT5

The Macro Backdrop: A Hawkish Fed

The market was fragile before the transfers. On 28 October the Federal Reserve held rates at 3.75% to 4.00% in a 10-2 vote, reported Fortune. Two officials dissented in favour of a hike.

Indicator Reading Source
Fed funds target range 3.75% to 4.00% Fortune, 28 Oct 2026
Vote 10-2, with two dissents for a hike Fortune
September CPI 3.7% year on year Fortune
Market-implied odds of a December hike About 78% Fortune

Source: Fortune. Market-implied odds change daily. Forecasts are not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Higher rates tend to weigh on speculative assets. For more on that meeting, see our note on the Fed's hawkish hold.

Bitcoin Technical Levels to Watch

The levels below come from liquidation data and from the price action of the day. They are indicative only.

Level Type Why it matters
$84,705 Resistance Cluster of about $1.36bn in shorts
$80,000 Round number Broken at 20:34 UTC
$78,500 Intraday low area Tested after the first reports
$76,707 Support Cluster of about $1.9bn in longs

Sources: ChainCatcher (CoinGlass data), Odaily, Coindoo. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

The five-year table below puts the day's moves in context.

Five-Year Performance in Context

Crypto prices have swung widely over the past five years. The table shows annual changes and year-end closes for each full calendar year from 2021 to 2025.

Year BTC year-end close BTC change ETH year-end close ETH change BNB year-end close BNB change
2021 $46,218 +59.7% $3,678.20 +399.8% $511.71 +1,269%
2022 $16,564 -64.2% $1,196.90 -67.5% $246.35 -51.9%
2023 $42,323 +155.5% $2,283.30 +90.8% $312.44 +26.8%
2024 $93,780 +121.6% $3,346.80 +46.6% $700.99 +124%
2025 $87,711 -6.5% $2,973.90 -11.1% $862.80 +23.1%
2026 to 29 Oct ~$79,143 about -9.8% ~$2,273 about -23.6% ~$705 about -18.2%

Period: calendar years 2021 to 2025, plus 2026 to 21:46 UTC on 29 October. Sources: ChartRow (Bitcoin), ChartRow (Ethereum), WalletInvestor (BNB), CoinGecko. 2026 changes are our calculation. Year-end closes differ slightly between data vendors. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Bitcoin closed 2025 with a 6% decline, its first negative year after a halving, reported Yahoo Finance. The large gains of 2023 and 2024 followed the deep falls of 2022. In 2022, all three assets lost more than half of their value.

Bitcoin Forecasts Before and After the Event

Published bank forecasts predate the transfers. We did not find a post-event price target from a major bank at the cut-off.

Who Forecast Published Source
Standard Chartered BTC at $100,000 by end-2026 (reaffirmed) 12 July 2026 Logos Press
Standard Chartered Possible dip to BTC $50,000 and ETH $1,400 before a rebound February 2026 The Block
Fed funds futures About 78% odds of a December rate hike 28 October 2026 Fortune

Forecasts are not a reliable indicator of future performance. Forecasts were made before the suspected Binance incident.

Three Illustrative Scenarios

The scenarios below are illustrative. They describe how markets could react to different outcomes. They are not predictions.

Scenario Possible trigger How markets could react
Internal move Binance says the transfers were authorised and funds return to its labelled wallets A relief bounce could follow, with BTC possibly retesting $80,000
Confirmed hack, losses covered Binance confirms a breach and covers losses from SAFU and other funds Volatility could ease over days, while BNB may lag for longer
Confirmed hack, contagion Long withdrawal pauses, losses beyond SAFU, or attackers selling ETH BTC could test the $76,707 cluster, and ETH could slide below $2,200

Illustrative scenarios based on the levels and data cited above. Forecasts are not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Hawkish US data could amplify any downside. US payrolls are due on 6 November and CPI on 10 November, according to FedRateCalc.

Upside and Downside Risks

Upside risks for crypto prices Downside risks for crypto prices
Stablecoin freezes may cut the net loss The forwarded ETH may be sold on the market
A clear statement from Binance may restore trust A long delay may deepen uncertainty
Full coverage of losses may ease fears of contagion Losses above SAFU may raise solvency questions
Short positions above $84,705 may fuel a squeeze Long positions below $76,707 may add to selling

Based on the data and sources cited in this article.

What Traders Often Watch After an Exchange Hack Report

Past exchange incidents suggest a few signals that markets have often reacted to. The list below describes them without recommending any action.

  • An official statement from Binance on what happened.
  • Further updates from Tether and Circle on the size of the freezes.
  • Movements of the forwarded ETH towards exchanges or mixers.
  • Notices about deposits or withdrawals on Binance's announcements page.
  • Attribution reports from blockchain security firms.
  • Changes in funding rates and open interest on derivatives venues.

Our guide to market volatility explains why sharp moves like these can reverse quickly. Our economic calendar lists the US data releases that may add to the swings.

Managing Risk When Crypto Is Volatile

Depending on the client's country and client category, Admirals offers CFDs on cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ether. Crypto CFDs are not available to retail clients in the UK, under FCA rules. The FCA confirmed in 2025 that this ban remains in place. A CFD on BNB was not listed in the contract specifications at the time of writing.

A crypto CFD is a contract on the price. It does not give ownership of the coin. Leverage magnifies losses as well as gains. In the EU, leverage on crypto CFDs for retail clients is capped at 1:2, a limit first set by ESMA. Conditions depend on the client's jurisdiction and entity.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Tools such as stop-loss orders can help manage risk. Gaps can still cause losses beyond the stop level. Our risk management guide covers position sizing in more detail. A demo account uses virtual funds, and results may differ from live trading.

Key Dates Ahead

Date Event Time (ET) Time (UK)
29 to 30 Oct Any official Binance update and issuer confirmations Not scheduled Not scheduled
1 Nov US clocks go back, ET becomes UTC-5 Not applicable Not applicable
6 Nov US nonfarm payrolls (October) 08:30 13:30
10 Nov US CPI (October) 08:30 13:30
18 Nov FOMC minutes 14:00 19:00
9 Dec FOMC rate decision 14:00 19:00

Sources: FedRateCalc, Federal Reserve. Dates and times may change.

Hot Wallet vs Cold Wallet

A hot wallet is connected to the internet so an exchange can process withdrawals quickly. A cold wallet is kept offline. Exchanges usually keep most reserves in cold storage.

Feature Hot wallet Cold wallet
Connection Online Offline
Speed of withdrawals Fast Slow
Exposure to online attacks Higher Lower
Typical share of exchange funds Smaller operating balance Larger reserve

General description for educational purposes.

Keeping most reserves offline is why a breach of one hot wallet does not automatically mean the loss of all customer funds. Even so, the sums tracked today are very large for operating wallets.

Invest with £1

Frequently Asked Questions

Was Binance hacked today?

Binance had not confirmed a hack by 21:50 UTC, though it said user funds were completely safe.

How much was taken in the suspected Binance hack?

On-chain tallies report about $5.6bn of outflows across several blockchains, though Binance has not confirmed any loss.

Did Tether freeze USDT linked to the transfers?

Yes. Tether's chief executive said on X that Tether had frozen more than 1.567bn USDT linked to the incident.

What is a hot wallet?

A hot wallet is an online crypto wallet that exchanges use to process withdrawals quickly for their customers.

What is the Binance SAFU fund?

SAFU is Binance's emergency reserve for users, holding 15,000 BTC, worth about $1.19bn at the 21:46 UTC Bitcoin price.

Why is crypto crashing today?

Reports of a suspected Binance breach added to selling, and $629m of positions were liquidated in one hour, mostly longs.

Has Binance been hacked before?

Yes. In May 2019 attackers stole about 7,000 BTC from a Binance hot wallet, later covered by SAFU.

Can retail clients in the UK trade crypto CFDs?

Crypto CFDs are not available to retail clients in the UK, and elsewhere access depends on jurisdiction.

Some of the content on this page was created with the help of automated tools. All final text has been reviewed by Admirals and is under its editorial responsibility.

INFORMATION ABOUT ANALYTICAL MATERIALS:

The given data provides additional information regarding all analysis, estimates, prognosis, forecasts, market reviews, weekly outlooks or other similar assessments or information (hereinafter “Analysis”) published on the websites of Admirals investment firms operating under the Admirals trademark (hereinafter “Admirals”) Before making any investment decisions please pay close attention to the following:

  • This is a marketing communication. The content is published for informative purposes only and is in no way to be construed as investment advice or recommendation. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and that it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
  • Any investment decision is made by each client alone whereas Admirals shall not be responsible for any loss or damage arising from any such decision, whether or not based on the content.
  • With view to protecting the interests of our clients and the objectivity of the Analysis, Admirals has established relevant internal procedures for prevention and management of conflicts of interest.
  • The Analysis is prepared by an analyst (hereinafter “Author”). The Author Admirals is an employee /a contractor for Admirals. This content is a marketing communication and does not constitute independent financial research.
  • Whilst every reasonable effort is taken to ensure that all sources of the content are reliable and that all information is presented, as much as possible, in an understandable, timely, precise and complete manner, Admirals does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained within the Analysis.
  • Any kind of past or modelled performance of financial instruments indicated within the content should not be construed as an express or implied promise, guarantee or implication by Admirals for any future performance. The value of the financial instrument may both increase and decrease and the preservation of the asset value is not guaranteed.
  • Leveraged products (including contracts for difference) are speculative in nature and may result in losses or profit. Before you start trading, please ensure that you fully understand the risks involved.

Sources

Admirals
Admirals An all-in-one solution for spending, investing, and managing your money

More than a broker, Admirals is a financial hub, offering a wide range of financial products and services. We make it possible to approach personal finance through an all-in-one solution for investing, spending, and managing money.

help-icon Live chat