Gold vs Real Rates vs USD – Why Historical Patterns No Longer Work Today

February 23, 2026 05:21

US Dollar Index chart with overlaid text reading "Why Gold, USD and Real Rate Correlations No Longer Work".

Why “yields down = gold up” is not a universal correlation and it generally does not hold since 2023

 

Gold, the US dollar, and real yields on US debt normally have the following relationships: 

In the short run, there is a light inverse relationship between gold and the US dollar, as measured by the dollar index (DXY; it tracks the performance of gold against other currencies, predominantly euro and yen). Since gold, like other assets, including oil, are denominated in dollars, if the price of the dollar falls, this might help increase the price of gold and vice versa. 

However, there are episodes when this connection is not strong or is not observed at all. Such episodes might include periods of strong liquidity demands and/or liquidity shortage on the international markets. Sometimes this coincides with other risks in the financial markets, which could simultaneously be beneficial for gold.  

The information in this article is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Here is part of how this could work: Huge amounts of debt globally are denominated in United States dollars (the so-called Eurodollar system) and debtors would have to buy dollars to repay their obligations, no matter how expensive the dollar is, hence in periods of stress (often when there is stress in the entire financial or forex system) this demand could further prop up the price of the dollar against other currencies. 

Hence sometimes both gold and the dollar could go up together at the same time. Such dynamics could be observed in the period after the onset of the Great Recession on Chart 1. 

Chart 1 

A TradingView chart comparing US Dollar Index and Gold performance.
Depicted: DXY and Gold, daily chart. 20 December 2008 to 30 October 2009. Source: Tradingview. Past performance is not indicative for future results. 

 

Over the long run, the dollar, like other fiat currencies, is continuously depreciating against gold, as we can see in the chart below. 

Chart 2

A TradingView monthly chart showing CFDs on Gold in USD.
Depicted: CFDs on gold in USD, monthly chart, Jan 1992 – Feb 2026. Data collected: 06.02.2026. Source: Admirals Platform. Past performance is not indicative for future results. 

 

Changes in yield on US bonds could affect the price of the dollar against other currencies also. Higher relative yields can lead to increased demand for dollars internationally. It should be noted that normally there is a strong demand for dollars globally, because the dollar is the world reserve currency. 

Gold and Interest Rates on US Government Bonds Historically

Historically there was a stronger inverse correlation between gold and yield on the 10-year United States bonds (we are using them as comparison, since they are the benchmark rate). This correlation tends to hold true in different regimes, as we see during the disinflationary 1980s in the United States on Chart 3. 

Chart 3 

A TradingView daily chart comparing US Government Bond Yield to Gold.
Depicted: Yield on US 10-year government bonds and price of gold, daily. 12 Feb 1980 to 20 Aug 1986. Source: Tradingview. Past performance is not indicative for future results. 

 

Still, it has to be observed that other major factors, like central bank decisions, demand and supply factors, and others, as we will see in a moment, could influence this connection.  

It also need to be noted that when deciding between gold and US bonds as a long-term instrument, investors take into consideration the real yield: nominal bond yield minus inflation. When inflation is high, real yield on bonds could even be negative, meaning investors are losing money by holding the said bond. Episodes of high inflation in particular tend to be very scary for the bonds markets overall. 

Why Correlation Between Gold and Bonds Existed? 

Why the inverse correlation? Both US government bonds and gold are regarded as safe-haven assets internationally. But there is at least one important distinction is: 

  • Gold does not produce cash flows.
  • US bonds do, in the form of interest. 

Hence, higher yields could lead to increased demand for US debt instruments and reduced demand for gold, thus could push the price of gold down. 

Another difference is the financial position of the US government. Because of continuous deficits and reduced long-term rating, investors could demand higher yields, even though US bonds are used as collateral globally. 

However, it needs to be noted that while sometimes yields on US government bonds could affect the price of gold, the reverse is scarcely true. Yields on long-term bonds depend predominantly on: 

  • Expected inflation over the long run
  • Expected GDP growth
  • Other risks and uncertainties (like geopolitical factors; however, they play less of role compared to the previous two) 

For bonds with shorter maturities (1-year, 5-year, several moths) monetary policy of the Federal Reserve and policies of the US Treasury could play a much more prominent role in affecting the bond yields. 

Gold and Yields – Is This Time Different?

“This time is different” tends be a scary saying on the markets. Yet since 2023 the inverse correlation between 10-year yields and the price of gold has broken.  

As can be observed on Chart 4, both gold and the yield on the 10-year government bond tend to be rising, even though the Federal Reserve resumed interest rates cuts in September 2024 (please note, that the chart for the 10-year yield is inverted). 

Chart 4 

A chart comparing Gold vs 10 year treasury yield.
Depicted: Gold and real 10-year treasury yield (inverted), 2003 – February 2026. Source: LongtermTrends. Past performance is not indicative for future results. 

 

Such a dynamic could be explained by new risks in the global financial system. Some of them include, among others: 

  • Freezing of sovereign country’s assets;
  • The possible threat to use the dollar and/or the SWIFT system as political instrument;
  • Unprecedented monetary intervention by many central banks since 2020;
  • High international trade uncertainty, brought by changes in the supply chains and political decisions (like the ongoing tariff confrontations and risk of export restrictions, especially on commodities like rare earth minerals);
  • Military conflicts – still ongoing and potential ones;
  • Some of the leading global economies are weak;
  • New political treaties and coalitions. 

These can explain the fact that central banks are buying the highest amounts of physical gold since 1971, when the last iteration of the gold standard (the so-called Bretton-Woods system) was discontinued by Richard Nixon. They could also explain why investors would require higher yields for government bonds – because of high perceived risks for higher inflation and weak economic growth in the future. 

Chart 5 

A FedWatch Tool showing expectations of Federal Reserve meeting outcome.
Depicted: Expectations of Federal Reserve decisions on interest rates during the FOMC meeting on 17 June 2026 – as of the time of writing there are 51.8% chance of a 25-basis points rate cut. Source: FedWatch Tool. Data collected: 6 February 2026. Past performance does not guarantee future results. 

 

Furthermore, in many regions, including the US and Japan, we observe higher inflation than central banks’ goals, expectations for further interest rate cuts, and increase of central banks balance sheets and/or fiscal stimulus, with continued high government spending and budget deficits in many countries. Historically all of these tend to be inflationary, hence this is part of the potential explanation for the higher demanded yields on government bonds and the higher price of gold. 

Practical Implications of the “New Regime” of High Gold and High Bond Yields 

Now that we understand the basic relationship between the US dollar (as represented by the DXY), the nominal and real yield on US bonds, and the price of the dollar, and that we already explained some risks in the system, what are the practical implications for traders and investors?  

  1. Politics dominates like never before – we must keep an eye on political and central banks’ decisions like never before. Possibly this new “regime” of high gold prices and relatively higher bond yields, but potentially weak dollar, could extend into the future, especially if the risks mentioned above are still present and global geopolitical relations are strained.
  2. Markets could change at an instant – one political decision could move markets and could disrupt our strategies, or potentially create new opportunities, as we have seen multiple times over the previous year.
  3. Higher volatility and prolonged inflation mean increased need to hedge our exposure or to protect our savings – something to consider, when participating in the markets or when trying to protect to purchasing power of our savings. It might be a good idea to consider even more diversified portfolio, especially if investing for the long run.
  4. Both gold and US government bonds are regarded as a safe-haven assets – and having central banks, which are key players in monetary decisions, accumulate them further, could mean that they are expecting continuous risks ahead. It is a good idea to consider this if you are interested in these assets or in the markets overall.
  5. Both gold and yield on government bonds are forward looking – meaning they often move because of expected risks. Thus, having them move in tandem (more or less) over the course of the past three years could be a very important indication that market participants are expecting further risks. However, potential episodes of renewed high inflation could threaten bonds and fixed-income instruments in general. 
  6. Current dynamics show that when participating on the market it is more important than ever to consider liquidity (increased demand in safe-haven assets could reduce liquidity and/or appetite for risk assets) and rotation between sectors.

Of course, the price of no instrument could go in one direction only. Thus, it might be prudent to consider the above-mentioned considerations, while still beware of overextended rallies, market hype, and FOMO buying, which was observed with gold in late 2025 and in the beginning of 2026. 

Historically many of the listed trends were beneficial for safe-haven assets. However, even though many trends (like the increased government spending and accumulated deficits, trade tensions, and conflicts in various parts of the world) are hard to reverse, as we mentioned already, a sudden political decision or series of decisions could change the entire setup discussed. Current dynamics require investors and traders to be more attentive and flexible than ever before.

Some of the sources: 

INFORMATION ABOUT ANALYTICAL MATERIALS:

The given data provides additional information regarding all analysis, estimates, prognosis, forecasts, market reviews, weekly outlooks or other similar assessments or information (hereinafter “Analysis”) published on the websites of Admirals investment firms operating under the Admirals trademark (hereinafter “Admirals”) Before making any investment decisions please pay close attention to the following:

  • This is a marketing communication. The content is published for informative purposes only and is in no way to be construed as investment advice or recommendation. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and that it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
  • Any investment decision is made by each client alone whereas Admirals shall not be responsible for any loss or damage arising from any such decision, whether or not based on the content.
  • With view to protecting the interests of our clients and the objectivity of the Analysis, Admirals has established relevant internal procedures for prevention and management of conflicts of interest.
  • The Analysis is prepared by an analyst (hereinafter “Author”). The Author Daniel Vasilev is an employee /a contractor for Admirals. This content is a marketing communication and does not constitute independent financial research.
  • Whilst every reasonable effort is taken to ensure that all sources of the content are reliable and that all information is presented, as much as possible, in an understandable, timely, precise and complete manner, Admirals does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained within the Analysis.
  • Any kind of past or modelled performance of financial instruments indicated within the content should not be construed as an express or implied promise, guarantee or implication by Admirals for any future performance. The value of the financial instrument may both increase and decrease and the preservation of the asset value is not guaranteed.
  • Leveraged products (including contracts for difference) are speculative in nature and may result in losses or profit. Before you start trading, please ensure that you fully understand the risks involved.

Daniel Vasilev
Daniel Vasilev Market Analyst and Educator

Daniel Vasilev is an economist, analyst, and educator with over 11 years of experience. Some of his focuses include commodities (especially precious metals), fundamental, and macroeconomic analysis.

help-icon Live chat